The Rockwrite Word « PREV | NEXT »: Collected Stories

May 23, 2010

Exit Through the Hall of Mirrors

Banksy's film "Exit Through the Gift Shop"--which I just saw in Portland, Oregon, and which is currently making its way across the country, according to its official site--is a thoroughly entertaining piece of work. It also seems like it's unusually difficult to approach critically. (Spoilers for it are under the cut, if anyone here cares about such things.)

The movie's premise, as the British street artist Banksy (his voice electronically altered, his face concealed) explains at the outset, is that it was originally going to be a documentary by the Los Angeles videographer Thierry Guetta about the street art movement. Guetta befriended (and obsessively videotaped) a number of artists in the scene, notably Shepard Fairey, and finally tracked down the very secretive and very successful Banksy, gaining his trust after a harrowing run-in with Disneyland security. 

When Guetta finally put together his documentary, though, it was basically unwatchable; Banksy decided that Guetta was a more interesting subject anyway, and recast Guetta's footage to make a documentary about him. He also suggested that Guetta should perhaps make some of his own art, to which Guetta responded by mortgaging everything he owned, opening a gigantic art studio to churn out massive amounts of awful work under the name "Mr. Brainwash," hyping what turned out to be a hugely successful debut show in L.A., and designing the cover of Madonna's Celebration, all of which is documented in the final half-hour of the movie.

That's what it alleges to document, anyway. My initial reaction to the movie was "I can't believe that's not fiction"--mostly because Mr. Brainwash's art is just stunningly stupid and derivative, and usually derivative of specific work by specific artists Guetta has filmed. I started digging around online once I got home, and quickly found that there were a lot of people claiming that Mr. Brainwash didn't exist. Or, rather, that he sort of didn't exist: he was indeed the subject of an L.A. Weekly cover story in 2008, and the show (and the Madonna cover) did indeed happen. But there doesn't seem to be much documentation of his existence before his public debut, and the similarity of a lot of his work to fourth-rate Banksy and Fairey knockoffs--not to mention the prankishness of the street-art world--suggests that maybe Brainwash is a joke on the art scene perpetrated by Banksy and company.

(The more I thought about Gift Shop after that, the more certain elements of the movie didn't add up: who was taking pictures of Guetta filming Banksy at Disneyland? why would a Frenchman whose English has, as Roger Ebert noted, an "Inspector Clouseau accent," respond in English to somebody asking him an urgent question in French?)

As a filmgoer who has a troubled relationship with the idea of "genre" in all kinds of media, my favorite movies are often the ones that aren't easily nailed down about what kind of movie they are. (The champion of this approach, in my personal pantheon, is Abbas Kiarostami's Close-Up, but Rushmore and Donnie Darko, for instance, have also hit that button for me in different ways.) So, as a filmgoer, I've been telling friends that maybe they might enjoy seeing it too.

But I'm also glad, in this case, that I'm not a professional film critic, because Banksy has put the "is it real or is it a fake?" problem directly in the path of any kind of critical discourse about Gift Shop; there's no way to get around it. If it's actually a true story, its point is that hustle supersedes art. (But it's probably not quite true.) If it's a Spinal Tap-type mockumentary, it's art about the way hustle can sometimes seem to supersede art. (But it's demonstrably not totally false.) If the fragment of Guetta's movie that we see is genuine, it's proof that he's, as Banksy puts it, "just a mentally ill person with a camera"; if it's not, it's a wicked parody of terrible video art; and so on. Here I was, thinking that years of dealing with pop music meant I no longer had to have endless, circular trains of thought about "authenticity." Thanks for proving me wrong, Banksy. 

May 23, 2010 10:54 PM | | Comments (2)

2 Comments

Thanks, Douglas. You are right about the difficulty of critical approach. For instance, just to write the short review here, you felt the need to do a bit of online investigative journalism on "the artwork” just to discern more precisely “the reality” of what you saw.

If this film had been around when David Shields was writing his current work Reality Hunger, he could have cited the film as emblematic of the artistic movement his book is attempting to outline. This excerpt from Shields’ lauded manifesto on the intertwining strands of fiction and reality in contemporary literature, memoir, and journalism describes perfectly many of the elements at play in Blanksy’s film.

“An artistic movement, albeit an organic and-as-yet unstated one, is forming. What are its key components? A deliberate unartiness: “raw” material, seemingly unprocessed, unfiltered, uncensored, and unprofessional. (What, in the last half century, has been more influential than Abraham Zapruder’s Super-8 film of the Kennedy assassination?) Randomness, openness to accident and serendipity, spontaneity; artistic risk, emotional urgency and intensity, reader/viewer participation; an overly literal tone, as if a reporter were viewing a strange culture; plasticity of form, pointillism; criticism as autobiography; self-reflexivity, self-ethnography, anthropological autobiography; a blurring (to the point of invisibility) of any distinction between fiction and nonfiction: the lure and blur of the real.”

Douglas, does this mean you weren't up for "Furry Vengeance"?

Leave a comment

















Archives

Creative Commons License
This weblog is licensed under a Creative Commons License.


About

    ARTicles ARTicles is a project of 
    the National Arts Journalism Program, an association of some 500 journalists in the United States. Our group blog is a place for arts and cultural journalists to share ideas and information, to celebrate what we do, and to make the case for its continuing value. ARTicles is edited by Laura Collins-Hughes. To contact her, click here.
    more

    ARTicles Bloggers Meet our bloggers: Sasha Anawalt, MJ Andersen, Alicia Anstead, Laura Bleiberg, Larry Blumenfeld, Jeanne Carstensen, Robert Christgau, Laura Collins-Hughes, Thomas Conner, Lily Tung Crystal, Richard Goldstein, Patti Hartigan, Glenn Kenny, Wendy Lesser, Ruth Lopez, Nancy Malitz, Douglas McLennan, Tom Moon, Abe Peck, Peter Plagens, John Rockwell, Werner Trieschmann, Lesley Valdes and Douglas Wolk. more

    NAJP NAJP is America's largest organization dedicated to the advancement of arts and cultural journalism. The NAJP has produced research, publications and discussions and works to bring together journalists, artists, news executives, cultural organization administrators, funders and others concerned with arts and culture in America today. more

    Join NAJP Join America's largest organization of arts journalists. Here's how more

see all archives

Contact: articles@najp.org

Recent Comments