Recently by Laura Collins-Hughes

Don't Hurt the Children

The trope of the cold-blooded critic was strongly challenged this week when some New York reviewers, on Broadway no less, went out of their way not to inflict unnecessary harm on a pair of young artists who were out of their depth. Not wanting to inflict harm on theatergoers, either, however, they did their job and unanimously proclaimed the pair's musical, "Glory Days," the fiasco it evidently was -- "was" being the operative word for a show whose opening night proved also to be its closing night.

"Glory Days," which transferred from Signature Theatre in Arlington, Va., used the youth of its creators, now all of 23 and 24, as a marketing hook. Critics like Clive Barnes in the New York Post didn't let that greenness temper their derision, but others saw it as a reason to take pity.


Show business is full of stories about talent recognized too little, too late.

Not as obviously sad, but potentially as destructive, is the less common case of too much, too soon.

But so it is with "Glory Days" ...

As a first effort by bright newcomers, the piece has youthful promise. As a grown-up offering in a Broadway house (not to mention at Broadway prices), this little-show-that-can't is so far in over its sweet head that we fear for its safety.

Eric Grode, in The New York Sun, blamed the adults: "Not many writers in their early 20s would turn down an offer to come to Broadway on the grounds that their material wasn't remotely ready yet. That's the job of more seasoned veterans, such as [director Eric] Schaeffer or the producers."

Ben Brantley, in The New York Times, was gentler, though no less clear:

I can see why the producers of "Glory Days" might have thought this was an auspicious moment for a big-time New York transfer.

Ultimately, though, they have done this little, hopeful show no favors by dragging it into a spotlight that invites close and unforgiving inspection. I do find it heartening that a pair of enthusiastic and gifted young artists have fallen in love with that beleaguered form, the musical, as a means of self-expression.

A raft of reviews unambiguously terrible enough to shutter the show immediately, yes, but the most responsible of them were not unkind.
Former NAJP fellow Joshua Seftel, who's made a career as a documentarian, has brought a timely new comedy to the Tribeca Film Festival. "War, Inc.," co-written by and starring John Cusack, is screening all week, and S. James Snyder, a film critic for The New York Sun (where I work), is calling it one of the festival's not-to-be-missed events. Josh (NAJP 2002-03) is part of a Tribeca Talks panel discussion by directors and cinematographers tomorrow at 2 p.m. at the New School.

Let Us Now Praise Filmic Women

Amid the gloom that's permeated ARTicles of late, heartening news arrived this afternoon about a former NAJP fellow who's a genuine, working, staff critic at a major metro daily. The all-around excellent Ann Hornaday (NAJP 1994-95) was a finalist for the 2008 Pulitzer Prize for criticism, adding to the effervescence of a day when her paper, The Washington Post, walked away with a half-dozen Pulitzers. The five criticism jurors, among them former NAJP director Michael Janeway, lauded her "for her perceptive movie reviews and essays, reflecting solid research and an easy, engaging style."

Look Who's Been Long-Listed

The Orange Broadband Prize for Fiction released its long list today, with a familiar name right at the top. Former NAJP fellow Anita Amirrezvani (1998) is in the running for her first novel, "The Blood of Flowers," set in 17th-century Iran. The long list includes writers eligible for the £30,000 Orange Broadband Prize for Fiction, the £10,000 Orange Broadband Award for New Writers, or both.
In Sunday's New York Times, the always fun to parse Corrections section has an editor's note that's arresting in its opacity, given the glaring conflict of interest it acknowledges, as well as the carelessness that seems to have led to the piece in question making its way into the Times' pages:

A question-and-answer interview on March 2 in Arts & Leisure with the director and a cast member of the Classic Stage Company's production of "The Seagull" was conducted by Rosemarie Tichler, a freelance writer who is on the board of directors of Classic Stage. She disclosed this fact in a note to the assigning editor, but it was overlooked in the editing process. Had The Times noticed her affiliation, it would have sought another interviewer for the article.

Her board membership, or possibly the note itself, was "overlooked"? "Had The Times noticed her affiliation"?

Whoops.

I'm not totally unsympathetic; we all know what it's like to be overwhelmed by the incessant deluge of e-mail and the demand that we be constantly in touch. But come on. Paying attention to all notes from anyone you're about to assign or publish is part of the editing process.

After all, you never know. They might say, "BTW, that story I pitched? Hope it's not a problem that I'm on the board of the theater!"

Goegled

When it comes to the big journalism scandals -- plagiarism, fabrication, that sort of thing -- the arts desk tends to be left out of the action: unscathed, perhaps, but also sidelined, a mere spectator to the drama.

So it's ever so slightly startling to realize that many of the pieces purloined by Timothy Goeglein, who resigned Friday as an aide to President Bush after blogger Nancy Nall exposed his plagiarizing ways, are works of arts journalism.

Michiko Kakutani and James Sterngold in The New York Times, Tim Page and William Booth in The Washington Post, Eric Ormsby and Bruce Bennett in The New York Sun, Tracy Lee Simmons in the National Review, Roger Kimball in The Wall Street Journal -- the list goes on. All of them, and others, had their writing stolen by Goeglein, who submitted it under his own byline in "guest columns" for his hometown paper, the Fort Wayne, Ind., News-Sentinel.

The News-Sentinel said Saturday that "20 of 38 [of Goeglein's] columns published from 2000-08 have been found to have portions copied from other sources without attribution." But a quick compare-and-contrast of one such column with the original, a John Wayne centenary essay by Bruce Bennett in The New York Sun, shows that the "portion" lifted by the now disgraced White House aide could be, oh, just about the entire article -- augmented by some brief and appallingly cheesy passages that probably are Goeglein's own.

Notes from the Underground

Neatly handwritten in bold, black marker on a subway poster for the upcoming movie, "Semi-Pro":

WILL FERRELL. IN THE SAME ROLE YOU'VE SEEN 10 TIMES BEFORE. NOT FUNNY ANYMORE. SERIOUSLY.

Maybe sometimes you can say it in 15 words or less.

When Nudity Matters

The Guardian, home to some of the smartest and most entertaining arts blogs on the Web, has a thought-provoking piece by Andrew Haydon, who takes the British tabs to task for giggling and snorting like a pack of schoolchildren every time an actor does a nude role onstage. He's right, of course, that their behavior is juvenile; he's also right to censure theater PR people for encouraging and colluding in the idiocy.

Where Haydon goes wrong is in dragging Douglas Carter Beane's play, "The Little Dog Laughed," into the argument. " Already in the US this year," he writes, "column inches have been frittered away noting the trivial matter of a playwright objecting to some nudity that he wrote into a play being ignored by its current director."

 But there's nothing trivial about Beane's objection, and it's a legitimate story. As Chicago Tribune theater critic Chris Jones reported on his blog, Beane took issue with About Face Theatre, a gay and lesbian company in Chicago, for leaving out the nudity that is unambiguously written into his script. (The crucial stage direction: "When they are both naked, Mitchell kneels before Alex, the door opens, Diane walks in.") According to Playbill's Kenneth Jones, Beane had refused a pre-opening request to cut the nudity and threatened to shut ...


About Laura Collins-Hughes

I'm the deputy cultural editor of The New York Sun. My first foray into arts journalism occurred in the early 1990son Cape Cod, where Ispent three years writing theater criticism, among other things. I was passionate about arts journalism, but I was nonetheless briefly lured back to the news side until thechilly June afternoon when I did a one-off arts interview as a favor for an editor friend. Listening to Jose Quintero talk about Eugene O'Neill -- Mr. Quintero's cancer-ravaged voice amplified by a handheld machine, the fog shrouding Provincetown Harbor behind him -- convinced methat I needed to find my way back to doing cultural coverage, and so I did.

At various times since then, I have been the arts editor of the New Haven Register;a freelance writer for American Theatre, The New York Times, Newsday, Nextbook, and other publications; and a contributing news editor for ArtsJournal.com. I'm a member of the National Arts Journalism Program board, and I was a 2005 NAJP fellow at Columbia University.



About

    ARTicles Arts journalism is changing underneath us. Every news organization is rethinking how it covers culture, and every week brings new evidence of those changes. We are members of the National Arts Journalism Program, an association of some 500 arts and... more

    NAJP NAJP is America's largest organization dedicated to the advancement of arts and cultural journalism. The NAJP has produced research, publications and discussions and works to bring together journalists, artists, news executives, cultural organization administrators, funders and others concerned with arts... more

    Join NAJP Join America's largest organization of arts journalists. Here's how... more

see all archives

Contact: articles@najp.org