Results tagged “permanent previews” from ARTicles

Spider-Man on Broadway - Official Site.jpgHow many Broadway shows got stories about them in the New York Times this week? Several, of course. But none got more than "Spider-Man", which had no fewer than nine stories in the Times this week, capped by two today. Not bad for a show that hasn't even officially opened. 

And the money ain't bad either. The Spidey box office is tingling, in previews beating most shows that have officially opened. This despite rafts of terrible reviews. This despite firing the principal artistic force behind the production and some of her lieutenants. This despite rewriting major plot points even as the old show is still playing. This despite announcing things are so bad that performances will close down for a few weeks to retool. 

It's the costliest show in Broadway history. Maybe it won't ever earn back its investment. But this endless season of previews surely sets new records for a show that hasn't opened. 

When Bill Clinton was president, his staff coined the term "permanent campaign" as a style of governing that treated everything the administration did as an audition for another term. 

So now we have the "permanent preview." It makes a joke out of the idea that previews are a finite trial to work out the kinks for the "real" show. Or does it? If the show doesn't work and producers continue to tinker with (or massively re-conceive) it, then technically the show still is in its gestation period. 

In not officially opening, the show doesn't have to put everything on the line. In not being set, reviews don't stick because the show you saw yesterday is not the show others will see tomorrow. The permanent preview inoculates this show from the final verdicts of reviews. It's an odyssey that is apparently so compelling that people are willing to pay high ticket prices to see. 

So an official opening (if it ever happens) - its "publishing" date - is the point the show will presumably be set and producers will stop tinkering with its innards.

But why go there? Especially if the backstage stories are compelling and box office is already good. A publish date means reviews will stick, the backstage stories will (probably) be done, and the box office could tank. Better to keep up the backstage drama while the onstage product isn't working and get the audience to pay to watch. Pure genius. 
March 25, 2011 3:47 PM |


Creative Commons License
This weblog is licensed under a Creative Commons License.


    ARTicles ARTicles is a project of 
    the National Arts Journalism Program, an association of some 500 journalists in the United States. Our group blog is a place for arts and cultural journalists to share ideas and information, to celebrate what we do, and to make the case for its continuing value.

    ARTicles Bloggers Meet our bloggers: Sasha Anawalt, MJ Andersen, Alicia Anstead, Laura Bleiberg, Larry Blumenfeld, Jeanne Carstensen, Robert Christgau, Laura Collins-Hughes, Thomas Conner, Lily Tung Crystal, Richard Goldstein, Patti Hartigan, Glenn Kenny, Wendy Lesser, Ruth Lopez, Nancy Malitz, Douglas McLennan, Tom Moon, Abe Peck, Peter Plagens, John Rockwell, Werner Trieschmann, Lesley Valdes and Douglas Wolk. more

    NAJP NAJP is America's largest organization dedicated to the advancement of arts and cultural journalism. The NAJP has produced research, publications and discussions and works to bring together journalists, artists, news executives, cultural organization administrators, funders and others concerned with arts and culture in America today. more

    Join NAJP Join America's largest organization of arts journalists. Here's how more

see all archives



Recent Comments